None of the studies were randomized controlled trials most had a quasi-experimental design, for example, comparative experimental evaluation studies nested on other ongoing cross-sectional surveys. After deduplication, we screened 2533 papers, and 14 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Results: Our search produced 3817 papers. The review authors used EndNote for deduplication and Rayyan for screening. A third author mediated any disagreements. In total, 2 independent authors screened the title and abstract, and extracted data from selected papers. We included randomized and nonrandomized studies that examined data quality and cost reduction outcomes, as well as usability, user experience, and usage parameters. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Web of Science, EconLit, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CDSR to identify relevant studies from 2008 to 2018. Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of the interviewer-administered electronic data collection methods on data quality and cost reduction in PLS compared with traditional methods. However, there is a lack of systematic evidence to show the potential impact of electronic data collection tools on data quality and cost reduction in interviewer-administered surveys compared with the standard paper-based data collection system. Using electronic devices such as smartphones and tablet computers improves the quality and cost-effectiveness of public health surveys. Data collection mechanisms in PLS seem to be a significant determinant in avoiding mistakes. Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal 10 articlesĮmail: A population-level survey (PLS) is an essential and standard method used in public health research that supports the quantification of sociodemographic events, public health policy development, and intervention designs.JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology 32 articles.JMIR Biomedical Engineering 68 articles.
Journal of Participatory Medicine 78 articles.JMIR Perioperative Medicine 89 articles.
0 kommentar(er)
